Ronald De Sousa’s introduction to Love is very much grounded in psychology and the related fields of neurology, evolutionary psychology and biology. New concepts like limerance are introduced and prove interesting, but the disciplinary focus tends to lead to a reductive set of anthropocentric and slightly androncentric discourses about love. Literature, for example, which one could argue has helped create and shape our ideas about love, is used by De Roussa to exemplify psychological ideas about love, and most of the poetry used is by men. The diversity of historical and cultural variables concerning love also felt fairly limited.
Paul Heitsch’s reading was tolerable, but i did feel like Fabio or Chef from South Park could have been called in for a discourse on love. Get creative Tantor!