I wish he would’ve stuck with what was on the cover instead of going off on tangents about things that did not have any correlation with the title. I like to read books to learn. If there is something I am not interested in, I won’t read it. I was interested in what he said the book was about and not everything else he would throw his opinion on. It really just ruined the rest of it, whether I agreed with what his tangents were about or not, it wasn’t necessary.